ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 204W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
200 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
+2112%
0.708 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jan 2009
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
40
Shading Units
240
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
204W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
GT200B
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
4.0
