ATI FireMV 2400 PCI vs NVIDIA A30 PCIe
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI and 24GB VRAM A30 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 165W)
NVIDIA A30 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Apr 2021
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Tesla Ampere
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
56
-
Shading Units
3584
4
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
24 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
165W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
RV380
GPU Name
GA100
-
-
-
Rage 9
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0
DirectX
N/A
2.0
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
-
Shader Model
N/A
