Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A310 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 17.02GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A310
+1300%
2.688 TFLOPS
GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition
0.192 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2022
Release Date
Dec 2008
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1750 MHz
Base Clock
-
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
266 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
17.02GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
768
Shading Units
64
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
28.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
5.376 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
30W
TDP
95W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
G94
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
G94-300-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
