Home GPU Comparison AMD AeroBox GPU vs AMD Atari VCS 400 GPU

AMD AeroBox GPU vs AMD Atari VCS 400 GPU

We compared two Game console GPUs: 8GB VRAM AeroBox GPU and 4GB VRAM Atari VCS 400 GPU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD AeroBox GPU 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.22GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
AMD Atari VCS 400 GPU 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 22% (1201MHz vs 985MHz)
Lower TDP (15W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
AeroBox GPU +282%
1.765 TFLOPS
Atari VCS 400 GPU
0.461 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2020
Release Date
Dec 2020
Console GPU
Generation
Console GPU
Game console
Type
Game console
-
Bus Interface
-

Clock Speeds

935 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
985 MHz
Boost Clock
1201 MHz
1066 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR4
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
68.22GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
14
Compute Units
3
896
Shading Units
192
56
TMUs
12
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

15.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.804 GPixel/s
55.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.41 GTexel/s
3.530 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
922.4 GFLOPS
1.765 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
461.2 GFLOPS
110.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
28.82 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Kryptos
GPU Name
Banded Kestrel
-
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
16 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
4.94 billion
Unknown
Die Size
210 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
15W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy