RTX 6000 Ada vs GeForce 210 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada and 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
18160 additional rendering cores
GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada
+260071%
91060
GeForce 210 PCI
35
Graphics Card
Dec 2022
Release Date
Oct 2009
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
915 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
142
SM Count
2
18176
Shading Units
16
568
TMUs
8
192
ROPs
4
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.900 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.800 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
300W
TDP
31W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
GT216
AD102
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.2
6.8
Shader Model
4.1
