Quadro P2000 Mobile vs Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 67% (1291MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2974
Quadro K5200
+19%
3553
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+1%
2096
Quadro K5200
2072
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+83%
1723
Quadro K5200
941
Blender
Quadro P2000 Mobile
231
Quadro K5200
+26%
293
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
9
SM Count
-
1152
Shading Units
2304
72
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
48
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1280 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GK110B
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
