Quadro M2000 vs A10M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 24GB VRAM A10M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
A10M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 41% (1635MHz vs 1163MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
6400 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1786
A10M
+1212%
23440
Graphics Card
Apr 2016
Release Date
Feb 2022
Quadro
Generation
Tesla Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
796 MHz
Base Clock
975 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
1635 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
56
768
Shading Units
7168
48
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
56
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.8 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
366.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.44 TFLOPS
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.44 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
732.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
GA102
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
