GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 260M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 60.80GB/s)
912 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 65W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+698%
2458
GeForce GTX 260M
308
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Mar 2009
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
GeForce 200M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1035 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
60.80GB/s
Render Config
16
SM Count
14
1024
Shading Units
112
64
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.800 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.80 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
308.0 GFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
65W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
G92
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
N10E-GT
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
