GeForce GT 430 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 430 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GT 430 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 70W)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2720 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GT 430
269
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+4360%
12000
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GT 430
145
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+5518%
8147
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce GT 430
58
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+6108%
3601
Graphics Card
Oct 2010
Release Date
Feb 2024
GeForce 400
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
22
96
Shading Units
2816
16
TMUs
88
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
11.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
49W
TDP
70W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF108
GPU Name
AD107
GF108-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
