GeForce 210 vs FireGL V8650
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce 210 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
FireGL V8650 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
304 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
39
FireGL V8650
+1028%
440
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Aug 2007
GeForce 200
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR4
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
320
8
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
16
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
R600
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.0
